How To Contest A Speeding Camera Ticket And Win
Why should you lot ever fight your traffic ticket?
You are entitled to a vigorous defence force against any criminal allegations . And that'southward what a traffic ticket is: it's an allegation of a criminal infraction. It is your right to full and vigorous defense against any and all criminal allegations. Y'all should exercise that right vigorously and without compromise and you should not feel guilty for doing so.
When yous receive a traffic ticket, the court will usually suggest that you must appear twice to competition it: first to appear and plead not guilty and 2nd to stand up trial with the officer nowadays. This is not true. You can contest your ticket by mail service without making a single courtroom appearance. Battling your commendation through the mail gives yous a better gamble of winning your case than at a courtroom trial. Fifty-fifty if you seem to be guilty of violating the constabulary, the procedural hassles for the prosecution will often lead to a dismissal. If the prosecution does not submit its version of events in writing to the court by the deadline appointment, your case will be dismissed regardless of your guilt or innocence. Dismissals due to lack of prosecution are won in approximately 30% of written defenses.
The law allows you to contest any traffic infraction entirely by postal service. Yous can appear via mail service through a Written Non Guilty Plea pursuant to California Vehicle Lawmaking 40519(b). In your plea you can request a Trial past Written Announcement pursuant to CVC 40902. In this fashion you can contest your citation without appearing at all and, for reasons already discussed, will have a ameliorate adventure of winning than at trial. Farther, if you lose your trial past declaration, you accept 20 days to asking a Trial de Novo (new trial) pursuant to CVC 40902(d). Yous then can appear in courtroom for the showtime time for your second chance of winning.
Why doesn't the court inform every defendant of their legal right to appear in courtroom via mail (Written Non Guilty Plea), contest via mail (Trial by Written Declaration), and accept a new trial (Trial de Novo) if they are non happy with the effect of the first trial? Money. Most courtesy notices hardly mention or practise not mention these rights at all. Many courtesy notices from California traffic courts begin, "To avert the inconvenience and long lines associated with a courtroom appearance… pay the bail amount listed in a higher place." The justice system uses its own bureaucratic inefficiency to discourage you from seeking justice. Nice.
If they even mention the possibility of battling a citation, they also mention that this generally requires two courtroom appearances, one to plead non guilty, a second for the actual trial. If yous do announced in person to plead not guilty, most courts will brand you lot enter your plea final, inconveniencing you to the maximum. Then it volition ask you to return to court for a trial. The ii days' pay lost through these two separate appearances amounts to more than the traffic fine for near people. This is why less than 1% of cited motorist e'er bother to contest their citation. Ignorant of their legal rights, confused and intimidated by the courts and police, 99% of Californians ticketed only pay upwardly.
The California Traffic Court Organization extorts over a billion dollars a year from California citizens by keeping us ignorant of our rights. They confuse and intimidate u.s.a. with a muddled "courtesy" notice mentioning license suspension and jail as possibilities (these are just possibilities for those who ignore the citation entirely). The courts also do good from the inherent respect well-nigh people have for the police force that keeps them from questioning the officers' often-capricious decision to issue a citation.
California traffic courts use the formality of the courthouse to further intimidate those brave enough to appear, scaring them into pleading guilty or accepting an consignment to attend traffic school. The court potent-arms the majority of defendants, too busy or as well intimidated to appear, to surrender without a fight: we collapse like a slice of IKEA piece of furniture and meekly mail in the protection coin hoping these bullies will leave us lone. By sustaining this proctological dissonance, California traffic courts rake in a small fortune for land, county, and local governments. Al Capone would be proud.
The court has done its best to discourage y'all from battling your ticket. My site is designed to expose the not-then-scary Wizard of Oz hiding behind the trappings and formality of the police. You tin contest your ticket by mail without a single court appearance. Y'all can win your case with a unmarried letter of the alphabet. You can do your right equally a citizen to be heard. The state-sponsored car tax via unfair commendation can be overcome.
My site volition bear witness you how to contest by postal service with footstep-by-step instructions independent in the Shareware. If y'all are fix to fight dorsum, go to my Shareware Registration page and join ticketassassin.com. I'll be here to guide you in using my shareware once you join. I hope to hear from you lot soon.
You can trounce your speeding ticket. You can beat your red-light-camera ticket. Yous can beat your cell-phone ticket.
Source: https://ticketassassin.com/why-you-should-always-fight-your-california-traffic-ticket/
Posted by: leachcalist.blogspot.com
0 Response to "How To Contest A Speeding Camera Ticket And Win"
Post a Comment